This table shows the elements of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment authorized for advertising by the County Board at its October 15, 2016 meeting.
In order to provide opportunities for public input, certain elements of the proposed amendment are broad, and staff’s final recommendation for County Board consideration in December will be informed through the public outreach process. The “community discussion” column in the table below includes an explanation of the areas in which the proposed amendment provides the best opportunities for continued discussion during the outreach process.
- Return to Short-Term Residential Rentals home page
- View the full text of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment
Element | Proposed Recommendation for Advertisement | Community Discussion | |
1 | Zoning districts |
|
The advertisement allows for consideration of further limiting the zoning districts where the use is allowed. |
2 | Accessory use | Accessory homestay would be allowed only when it is accessory to a residential dwelling unit use classified in the Zoning Ordinance as Household living. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
3 | Home occupation use | Accessory homestay would be regulated as a home occupation, and subject to all the same provisions as other home occupations (with the exception of the amendments described in the previous section of this report), plus additional provisions that would be unique to accessory homestay. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
4 | Signs | No signs would be allowed for accessory homestay use. This is consistent with the existing prohibition on signs for all home occupations. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
5 | Non-resident employees | Non-resident employees would be prohibited from performing work on the premises for an accessory homestay. The proposed advertisement would, however, allow non-resident employees to perform work-related to normal home maintenance, such as repair and care of the residence or property, including yard maintenance and house cleaning. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
6 | Area of dwelling unit used for accessory homestay | No limit is proposed (accessory homestay could include overnight rental of an entire house or apartment). | The advertisement allows for consideration of limits to the total area/percentage of the house or apartment that could be used for accessory homestay. |
7 | Parking | The proposed amendment includes an option to consider requiring one off-street parking space for accessory homestay.
Additionally, the proposed amendment includes an option to consider allowing up to one additional off-street parking space to be created on the property (subject to all applicable regulations) for an accessory homestay. Other home occupations prohibit the creation of an additional parking space that did not exist at the time of application. |
The advertisement allows for consideration of:
|
8 | Owner-occupancy and primary residence | Accessory homestay would be allowed only in dwelling units occupied by the owner of the unit as his/her primary residence, which would require that he/she live there for a minimum of 185-275 days of the year (a range is proposed to be advertised). | The advertisement allows for consideration of defining primary residency as the owner of the dwelling unit occupying the unit anywhere between 185 and 270 days per year.
However, the advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of whether owner-occupancy is required. |
9 | Cap | The proposed amendment would include an option for consideration to limit the number of dwelling units within any multiple-family building to the larger of either one unit, or 25% of the total number of dwelling units in the building.
Townhouses, duplexes, semidetached and two-family dwellings are not considered to be multiple-family buildings and thus would not be subject to the proposed cap. |
The advertisement allows for consideration of either no cap, a smaller cap (fewer units) or a larger cap (more units). |
10 | Maximum number of guests | An accessory homestay would be limited to a maximum of the greater of either:
|
The advertisement allows for consideration of limiting the provision to fewer guests. |
11 | Number of simultaneous contracts | An accessory homestay would be limited to no more than one contract for any overnight stay (e.g. a contract may be for a party of six, but an accessory homestay host could not contract with six separate individuals under separate agreements on the same night). | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
12 | Accessory dwellings | The proposed amendment would include an option to allow a dwelling unit with an approved accessory dwelling to be used for an accessory homestay, but the maximum number of guests for the accessory homestay would be reduced by the number of occupants of the accessory dwelling. Either the accessory dwelling or the main dwelling could be used for the accessory homestay. | The advertisement allows:
|
13 | Family/caregiver suites | The proposed amendment would allow a family/caregiver suite to be used for accessory homestay | The advertisement allows for consideration of allowing or prohibiting use of a family/caregiver suite for accessory homestay. |
14 | Detached accessory buildings | An accessory homestay would be allowed only within the main dwelling on the lot (which could include an approved attached accessory dwelling). Accessory buildings, garages or other structures on the lot could not be used for accessory homestay. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
15 | Safety equipment | The dwelling unit used for the accessory homestay would be required to have working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and a working fire extinguisher accessible to all overnight guests of the accessory homestay. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
16 | Building code | All applicable requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code must be met as follows:
|
The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
17 | Food and beverages | The owner (or his/her agent or contractor) could prepare or serve food or beverages to any overnight guests of the accessory homestay. | The advertisement allows for consideration of prohibiting or allowing the preparation and serving of food and beverages to overnight guests. |
18 | Commercial meetings | An accessory homestay could not be rented out for any other commercial use, such as parties, banquets, weddings, meetings, charitable fundraising, commercial or advertising activities or any other gatherings for direct or indirect compensation. | The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
19 | Accessory homestay application | The zoning application for an accessory homestay permit would require:
Additional application requirements, not proposed to be included in the Zoning Ordinance, are discussed later in this report. |
The advertisement does not allow for continued discussion of this element. |
20 | Accessory homestay permit | An accessory homestay permit would be required and would be issued by the Zoning Administrator upon approval of an accessory homestay application. The permit would:
Additional permit requirements, not proposed to be included in the Zoning Ordinance, are discussed later in this report. |
The advertisement allows for the consideration of the validity of the permit for a period of a maximum of two years. |
21 | Revocation of an accessory homestay permit | An accessory homestay permit could be revoked by the Zoning Administrator as follows:
If an accessory homestay permit is revoked, the applicant would not be eligible to receive a new accessory homestay permit for up to two years. |
The advertisement allows for consideration of the revocation period before a new accessory homestay can be approved, for a maximum of two years. |